If the charter was amended in a manner the country taken into consideration unacceptable, the nation had the proper to leave the Union.
In growing the idea of nullification, Calhoun did not intend to encourage states to secede. He sought simplest to give them a way to make sure a strict interpretation of the constitution and lead the kingdom far from ‘the harmful and despotic doctrine of consolidation’ and again to ‘its actual confederative character.’ This turned into in particular critical for the minority South. ‘The predominant and dominant birthday party will have no need of those regulations for his or her safety,’ Calhoun wrote. The minority, but, required ‘a creation [of the Constitution] which might confine these powers to the narrowest limits.’
The position of nullification in any destiny debate over slavery was clear: with the potential to outline the phrases of their membership in the Union, states could be capable of deny the federal government any regulatory electricity over slavery.